Dual-language controversy

An education story from the Yakima Herald-Republic this morning caught my attention. Parents and teachers in Wapato are seeking the removal of their superintendent following the elimination of a dual-language learning program.

The model is similar to what Walla Walla Public Schools offers at Sharsptein and Edison elementary schools. Children, both English and Spanish native speakers, are taught English and Spanish equally as they go through school.

The Yakima article, and the reader comments following it, are interesting. But what the comments leave out is that English-speaking children benefit from such programs by learning a second language at a young age.

In foreign countries, it is often the norm (at least in private schools) to teach children at least one other language as they go through school. The few years I spent as a child in Peru (a Spanish-speaking country) I attended a school where I was also taught English. A good friend of mine learned German. Other people I know learned Quechua, a native language.

Such local programs seem to be quickly tarnished because of the belief that they may hinder children’s ability to learn the country’s main language, English. But I would want to add the monkey wrench that having children who can read, write and speak two languages is a good thing.

Although some English Language Learner programs are not ideal, the dual-language programs seem to be popular and successful because of the equal dedication to both languages.

Any thoughts?

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...
Bilingual education, Uncategorized, Walla Walla Public Schools

If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Comments

3 Responses to “Dual-language controversy”

Leave Comment

(required)

(required)


« Back to text comment